New public notices published in the issue of August 3, 2009
Public Hearing Notice Site Plan/Special Use PermitFor Centra Sota CooperativeAt 190 Jackson Avenue SW(Phase IV)
Notice here hereby given that Cokato Planning & Zoning Commission, Wright County, Minnesota will conduct a Public Hearing at 6 p.m., Monday, August 17th, 2009 in the city council chambers. The commission will consider an application for Site Plan/Special Use Permit from Centra Sota Cooperative to allow the redevelopment of parcel G (Phase IV) with construction of a new 10,000 sq. ft. warehouse facility/cold storage in a Multi Use (M1) district in the vicinity of Century Avenue/1st Street SW.
Beg at Pt 75 ft. No. of Ctr of RR tracks on E Ln of NE 1⁄4 of NE 1⁄4 th West on R/W Ln 16 rods fr POB th No 165 ft th W 200 ft. Par/W N Ln of NE 1⁄4 of NE 1⁄4 Th S to N Ln of RR R/W th E alg SD R/W to POB.
Persons wishing to attend the public hearing should do so. Written comments may be submitted anytime prior to the Planning Commission/City Council meetings to 255 Broadway Avenue South, Cokato, Minnesota 55321.
Published in the Enterprise Dispatch Aug. 3 and 10, 2009.
Public Hearing Notice Special Use Permitfor Lundeen Auctions & Appraisals Incat 460 Cokato Street West
Notice is hereby given that the Cokato Planning & Zoning Commission, Wright County, Minnesota will conduct a Public Hearing at 6 p.m., Monday, August 17, 2009 in City Council Chambers. The commission will consider an application for a Special Use Permit from Lundeen Auctions & Appraisals to allow an Auction House with indoor/outdoor sales and issuance of a license for “On Line Fire Arm Sales” in a Highway Commercial (C2) District located at 460 Cokato Street West.
Issuance of a Special Use Permit will qualify the applicant for a license under city ordinance, Chapter 7, 507.01 to 507.34 ie. establishing Pawn Shops, Brokers, Secondhand Goods Dealers, Precious Metal Brokers, Consignment House Dealers, Auction House Dealers and Traders.
North 32 rods of the East 24 rods of the NE 1⁄4 of NE 1⁄4 except Tr Des in Book 274-280 Except South 250 feet of North 528 feet of East 396 feet of NE 1⁄4, Unplatted Land, Section 33, Twp. 119, Range 28.
Persons wishing to attend the public hearing should do so. Written comments may be submitted at anytime prior to the planning commission/city council meetings to 255 Broadway Ave. South, Cokato, Mn. 55321.
Published in the Enterprise Dispatch Aug. 3 and 10, 2009.
PUBLIC NOTICE ORDINANCE AMENDMENTON THE 20TH DAY OF JULY, 2009 AT A DULY AUTHORIZED REGULAR MEETING THE DASSEL CITY COUNCIL THE FOLLOWING LANGUAGE WAS ADOPTED AS AN AMENDMENT TO DASSEL CITY CODE REPLACING SECTION 72.21 LIMITED PARKING WITH:
Section 72.21 LIMITED PARKING.
(A) No person shall stop, stand or park a vehicle upon the public streets of the city where official signs are erected limiting the parking time thereon, for a period of time in excess of the time designated by the official signs.
(B) Unlawful act. It is unlawful for any person to leave or park any vehicle on or within any street or right of way in the City of Dassel for a period in excess of seventy-two (72) hours
(C) Definition. For the purpose of this ordinance a “recreational vehicle” is defined as follows: travel trailers, including those that telescope or fold down, chassis mounted campers, house cars, motor homes, tent trailers, slip in campers, non-motorized trailers intended and generally used for transporting boats, utility trailers, snowmobiles, all terrain vehicles, boats or other watercraft.
(D) Unlawful Act. It is unlawful for any person to leave or park a “recreational vehicle” on or within the limits of any street or right of way in the City of Dassel for a continuous period in excess of seventy-two (72) hours. Be it hereby additionally provided, that during the 72 hour period, the vehicle shall not be occupied as living quarters. The mere moving of the recreational vehicle to another location within the street or right of way shall not constitute having satisfied the intent of this section.
(E) Exceptions. The above time limits will apply to all standard weeks within any given year with the following exceptions:
(1) During nationally recognized legal holiday weekends the above time period shall be extended to 5 days (120 hours).
(2) The provisions under Section 72.16 of this code shall supersede this section where applicable. (note that Section 72.16 is the public works and winter parking regulations)
(F) Violations. A vehicle parked in violation of this ordinance will be subject to the following consequences:
1. First violation: Verbal warning to the owner or driver of the vehicle if that person is available. If the owner or driver is not available, a written warning will be issued.
2. Second violation: A written warning will be issued to the owner or driver of the vehicle.
3. Third violation: The vehicle may be towed away to any garage, service station, or other place of safekeeping and impounded. The owner shall pay the costs of such towing and storage.
(G) Separate Violations. Each 24 hour period beyond the initial verbal warning of the violation ((F) (1)) shall constitute a separate violation of this ordinance. Administrative fines as established by City Council may be levied in addition to the actions noted in 72.21; paragraph (F). Nothing in this section shall prevent a law enforcement official or other City Official from ordering a vehicle to be towed if it is determined that the vehicle poses an immediate threat to the health, safety, and welfare of the community.
I, Myles Mc Grath, City Clerk in and for the City of Dassel, MN do hereby certify that the afore going language is a true and correct copy of the language adopted by the Dassel City Council a duly authorized meeting of that body and as contained in the records of said meeting in my possession. The amendment was made as prescribed by law and shall become effective following the publication of said language as herein contained.
Myles Mc Grath
City of Dassel
Published in the Enterprise Dispatch Aug. 3, 2009.
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF WRIGHT
TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICTCIVIL DIVISIONCourt Type: Quiet Title
Court File No. 86-CV-09-5326
Gary M. Lankki and Wendy B. Lankki,
Husband and WifePlaintiffs,
Jonathan W. Goldsberry & Amanda S. Goldsberry, Husband and Wife, Reid C. Danielson & Vicky L. Danielson, Husband and Wife, Rodney J. Fiecke, and Lisa M. Fiecke, Husband and Wife, also all other persons unknown claiming any right, title, estate, interest, or lien in the real estate described in the complaint herein,
THE STATE OF MINNESOTA TO EACH OF THE ABOVE NAMED DEFENDANTS:
You, and each of you are hereby summoned and required to serve upon Plaintiffs’ attorney an Answer to the Complaint which is on file in the office of the Court Administrator of the above named Court within twenty (20) days after service of this summons upon you, exclusive of the day of service. If you fail to do so judgment by default will be taken against you for the relief demanded in the complaint.
This action involves, effects, or brings in question, real property situated in the County of Wright, State of Minnesota described as follows, to wit:
That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 28, Township 119, Range 28, Wright County, Minnesota, described as follows:
Commencing at the Northeast corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter; thence on an assumed bearing of South 00 degrees 32 minutes 08 seconds West, along the east line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter a distance of 226.59 feet to the centerline of a Township Road, and the point of beginning; thence North 88 degrees 03 minutes 22 seconds West, along said centerline, a distance of 196.13 feet; thence South 00 degrees 32 minutes 28 seconds East a distance of 497 feet more or less, to the shore of Brooks Lake; thence easterly along said shore line to the said east line of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter; thence North 00 degrees 32 minutes 08 seconds East, along said east line, a distance of 523 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning.
Containing 2.33 acres more or less.
The object of this action is to obtain a judgment that Plaintiffs are the owners in fee of the above described real property as joint tenants, and that none of the said Defendants have any estate or interest therein or lien thereon.
Dated: July 24, 2009
/s/ Brian M. Olsen
Attorney for Plaintiffs
P.O. Box 988
Cokato, MN 55321
Published in the Enterprise Dispatch Aug. 3, 10, and 17, 2009.