www.herald-journal.com
Enterprise Dispatch Legal Notices
New public notices published in the issue of March 14, 2011
Notice of Mechanic’s Lien:
Notice is hereby given that the undersigned, Ron’s BP of Dassel, MN, 55325 has filed a Mechanic’s Lien against said parties: Jennifer Randall, New Ulm, MN , owner of a 2002 Pontiac Sunfire, license WN3947, and Fireside Bank & Finance, City of Industry, California, mortgage holder of said automobile. This filing is for the purpose of possesion of said automobile, which has been abandoned by the said owner and said mortgager. Letters of certification explaining intent of lien holder have been sent to both parties and return signed notices have been received. This vehicle has been abandoned beyond 45 days which is within the limits of Minnesota State Law which states, it is unlawful to abandon a car in the State of Minnesota.
Ron’s Service of Dassel Inc.
dba:Ron’s BP
150 Parker Ave West
Dassel, MN 55325
Published in the Enterprise Dispatch March 14, 2011.

STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF WRIGHT
DISTRICT COURT
TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
Case type: Other civil (Quiet Title Action)
Court File No. 86-CV-11-178
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems
Inc. and Jerry Korsbon,
Plaintiffs,
v.
Terry D. Van De Steeg; The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, National Association, f/k/a The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A. as Successor to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Trustee of RAMP 2006RS1; John Bergmann and Karen Bergmann; Kyle R. Hertell and Samantha M. Hertell, Nicole A. Hertell, Raymond O. Hertell and Dianne J. Hertell, State Bank of Cokato, and also all the unknown heirs of any of foregoing, if any, and also all other unknown persons claiming any right, title, estate interests, or lien in the real estate described in the Complaint,
Defendants.
SUMMONS
THIS SUMMONS IS DIRECTED TO Terry D. Van De Steeg, The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, National Association, f/k/a The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A. as Successor to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Trustee of RAMP 2006RS1; John Bergmann and Karen Bergmann; Kyle R. Hertell and Samantha M. Hertell, Nicole A. Hertell, Raymond O. Hertell and Dianne J. Hertell, State Bank of Cokato, and also all the unknown heirs of any of foregoing, if any, and also all other unknown persons claiming any right, title, estate interests, or lien in the real estate described in the Complaint.
1. YOU ARE BEING SUED. The Plaintiff has started a lawsuit against you. The Plaintiff’s Complaint against you is attached to this Summons. Do not throw these papers away. They are official papers that affect your rights. You must respond to this lawsuit even though it may not yet be filed with the Court and there may be no court file number on this Summons.
2. YOU MUST REPLY WITHIN 20 DAYS TO PROTECT YOUR RIGHTS. You must give or mail to the person who signed this summons a written response called an Answer within 20 days of the date on which you received this Summons. You must send a copy of your Answer to the person who signed this Summons located at:
Bradley N. Beisel
Beisel & Dunlevy, P.A.
282 U.S. Trust Center
730 Second Ave. S.
Minneapolis, MN 55402-2444
3. YOU MUST RESPOND TO EACH CLAIM. The Answer is your written response to the Plaintiff’s Complaint. In your Answer you must state whether you agree or disagree with each paragraph of the Complaint. If you believe the Plaintiff should not be given everything asked for in the Complaint, you must say so in your Answer.
4. YOU WILL LOSE YOUR CASE IF YOU DO NOT SEND A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT TO THE PERSON WHO SIGNED THIS SUMMONS. If you do not answer within 20 days, you will lose this case. You will not get to tell your side of the story, and the Court may decide against you and award the Plaintiff everything asked for in the Complaint. If you do not want to contest the claims stated in the Complaint, you do not need to respond. A default judgment can then be entered against you for the relief requested in the Complaint.
5. LEGAL ASSISTANCE. You may wish to get legal help from a lawyer. If you do not have a lawyer, the Court Administrator may have information about places where you can get legal assistance. Even if you cannot get legal help, you must still provide a written Answer to protect your rights or you may lose the case.
6. ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLU-TION. The parties may agree to or be ordered to participate in an alternative dispute resolution process under Rule 114 of the Minnesota General Rules of Practice. You must still send your written response to the Complaint even if you expect to use alternative means of resolving this dispute.
7. THIS LAWSUIT MAY AFFECT OR BRING INTO QUESTION TITLE TO REAL PROPERTY This action involves, affects, or brings into question real property situated in the County of Wright, commonly known as 415 2nd Street SE, Cokato, MN (the “Subject Property”) and which has sometimes been legally described as:
All that parcel of land in Wright County, State of Minnesota, as more fully described in Deed Document No. 728406, being known and designated as follows:
Tract One:
That part of the Lot C of Lot A of the Northeast of Section 34, Township 119, Range 28, described as follows: Beginning at a point 55 feet North of the South line of Lot C of Lot A on a prolongation of the West line of Block 1 of Griffith’s First Addition to Cokato; thence running in a Northeasterly direction 81 feet to a point 70 feet North from said South line of said Lot C of Lot A thence North to the Great Northern Railway Right of Way; thence West along said Railway Right Way Line to a point in a direct line North of the Point of beginning; thence South to the point of beginning, according to the place thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Wright County, Minnesota.
Tract Two:
The Way 33 feet of all that part of Lot C of Lot A of the West of the Northeast of Section 34, Township 119, Range 28 lying North of Second Street in Lee’s Addition to the Townsite of Cokato Extended East, According to the plat of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Wright County, Minnesota.
Tract Three:
Less and Except all that certain parcel of land conveyed to the City of Cokato, as set forth in Deed Document No. 728402, dated November 30, 2000 and recorded December 28, 2000 being known and designated as the following: That part of Lot C and D of Lot A of the Northeast of Section 34, Township 119, Range 28, Wright County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Northeast thence North 89 degrees 52 minutes 10 seconds West distance of 1631.79 feet to the point of beginning; thence continue North 00 degrees 04 minutes 49 seconds East along said line, a distance of 50.00 feet; thence North 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 33.00 feet; thence North 89 degrees 47 minutes 25 seconds East, a distance of 79.06 feet; thence North 85 degrees 03 minutes 22 seconds East, a distance of 122.48 feet; thence South 00 degrees 05 minutes 49 seconds West, a distance of 50.19 feet; thence South 85 degrees 03 minutes 22 seconds West, a distance of 120.14 feet; thence South 89 degrees 47 minutes 25 seconds West, a distance of 81.39 feet; thence North 89 degrees 59 minutes 56 seconds West, a distance of 33.00 feet to the point of beginning.
Tract Four:
That part of Lots C and D of Lot A of the Northeast of Section 34, Township 119, Range 28, Wright County, Minnesota according to the recorded plat thereof described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Northeast thence North 89 degrees 52 minutes 10 seconds West, assuming that the East line of said Northeast bears North 00 degrees 41 minutes 37 seconds West, a distance of 2601.09 feet; thence North 00 degrees 05 minutes 49 seconds East along a line that if extended would intersect the Northwest corner of said Northeast a distance of 1356.05 feet to the point of beginning; thence continue North 00 degrees 05 minutes 49 seconds East along said line a distance of 275.74 feet; thence South 89 degrees 59 seconds East a distance of 33.00 feet; thence South 00 degrees 05 minutes 49 seconds West distance of 274.80 feet; thence South 89 degrees 03 minutes 54 seconds West a distance of 33.01 feet to the point of beginning. By fee simple Deed from Hilmer A. Eyestad and Lorraine B. Eyestad, husband and wife, as set forth in Document No. 728406 dated December 18, 2000 and recorded December 28, 2000, Wright County, Minnesota.
The purpose of this action is to obtain an Order as follows:
1. Determining that the MERS Mortgage given by Terry D. Van De Steeg in favor of Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. as nominee for M & I Bank, FSB, recorded October 25, 2005 in the office of the Wright County Recorder as Document No. A983513 was a valid mortgage against the Subject Property, as set forth in the Hult Survey and as described by the Correct Legal Description.
2. Determining that the foreclosure of the MERS Mortgage Document No. A983513 was valid and that Sheriff’s Certificate of Foreclosure Sale dated January 25, 2010, recorded January 26, 2010 as Document No. 1139033 operated as a valid conveyance of the Subject Property, as set forth in the Hult Survey and as described by the Correct Legal Description.
3. Determining that the Assignment of Sheriff’s Certificate of Sale dated January 28, 2010, recorded February 23, 2010 as Document No. 1141025 operated as a valid conveyance of the Subject Property, as set forth in the Hult Survey and as described by the Correct Legal Description.
4. Determining that Trustee’s Deed dated September 7, 2010, recorded September 28, 2010 as Document No. 1157591 operated as a valid conveyance of the Subject Property to Jerry Korsbon, as set forth in the Hult Survey and as described by the Correct Legal Description.
5. Determining that Jerry Korsbon is the sole fee owner of the Subject Property as set forth in the Hult Survey and as described by the Correct Legal Description.
6. Determining that MERS and the Defendants herein have no right, title, lien or interest in the Subject Property as set forth in the Hult Survey and as described by the Correct Legal Description.
557.03 NOTICE OF NO PERSONAL CLAIM
Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 557.03 you are hereby served with notice that no personal claim is made against you and that any defendant upon whom this notice is served who unreasonably defends this action shall pay full costs to the plaintiff.
BEISEL & DUNLEVY, P.A.
Dated: January 5, 2011
By: /s/ Bradley N. Beisel #6191
282 U.S. Trust Building
730 Second Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55402-2444
Telephone: (612) 436-2222
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Published in the Enterprise Dispatch March 14, 21, and 28, 2011.

UNOFFICIAL SCHOOL BOARD MINUTES I.S.D. #466, BOARD OF EDUCATION 6:45 AM SPECIAL BOARD MEETING, FRIDAY, MARCH 4, 2011 DISTRICT BOARD ROOM COKATO, MN
In partnership with our communities, Dassel-Cokato Public Schools will provide all learners opportunities designed to maximize their potential and promote lifelong learning.
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a special meeting of the Board of Education of Independent School District No. 466 (Dassel-Cokato, Minnesota) was duly held in the District Board Room, Cokato, Minnesota, on Friday, March 4, 2011.
Board Chairman Kevin Bjork called the meeting to order at 6:50 AM.
The following members were present: McConkey, Bjork, Bender, and Linder. The following were absent: Clemen and Tormanen. Superintendent Powers was also present.
The meeting began with the pledge of allegiance.
Chairman Bjork closed the meeting at 6:51 pursuant to Minn. Stat. 13D.05, subd. 2(3) to discuss a proposed student expulsion.
Chairman Bjork opened the meeting at 6:55.
Board Member Bjork introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE PROPOSED EXPULSION/EXCLUSION OF THE STUDENT IDENTIFIED
IN THE ATTACHMENTS HERETO
(HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS THE “STUDENT”)
WHEREAS, the Student is a full-time student of the School District; and
WHEREAS, the Student was placed on suspension and proposed for expulsion/exclusion pursuant to the Pupil Fair Dismissal Act, Minn. Stat. § 121A.40–121A.56; and
WHEREAS, the Student and parents were properly served with written notice of the School District’s intent to initiate expulsion/exclusion proceedings; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Pupil Fair Dismissal Act, said notice contained a statement of the facts, witnesses and a description of their testimony, described alternative educational services, stated the date, time and place of hearing, and advised them of their rights, including their right to waive the hearing in writing if they wished to acquiesce to the expulsion/exclusion proposed by the School District; and WHEREAS, this notice was also accompanied by a copy of the Pupil Fair Dismissal Act, Minn. Stat. § 121A.40–121A.56; and
WHEREAS, the Student and parents elected to waive the scheduled hearing with the understanding that by such waiver, a term of expulsion/exclusion for a period of 12 months beginning with the date the Student is expelled/excluded would be submitted for action to the School Board of Independent School District No. 466.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the School Board of Independent School District No. 466 as follows:
1. The School Board of Independent School District No. 466 hereby accepts the Waiver of Hearing executed by the Student and the Student’s parent, a copy of which is attached hereto as “Exhibit A” and incorporated herein by reference.
2. Having reviewed the record relating to this matter, the School Board hereby finds that the School District has fully complied with the Pupil Fair Dismissal Act.
3. Having reviewed the record relating to this matter, the School Board hereby finds that the Student engaged in conduct that constituted willful violation of reasonable School Board regulations, willful conduct that significantly disrupts the rights of others to an education, or the ability of school personnel to perform their duties or school-sponsored extracurricular activities, and willful conduct that endangers the pupil or other pupils or surrounding persons, including School District employees, or property of the school. Due to the nature of the conduct engaged in by the Student, a term of expulsion/exclusion as proposed by the School District is reasonable and appropriate.
4. The School Board of School District No. 466 hereby orders that the expulsion/exclusion of the Student be imposed pursuant to the Pupil Fair Dismissal Act, Minn. Stat. § 121A.40–121A.56. Said expulsion/exclusion shall be imposed immediately for a period of 12 calendar months beginning with the date of this Resolution and in accordance with the written notice provided to the Student, a copy of which is attached hereto as “Exhibit B” and incorporated herein by reference.
5. The Clerk of the School Board is directed to provide written notice of the expulsion/exclusion to the Student and parents in substantially the form provided in the attached “Exhibit C.”
6. It is further ordered that pursuant to a proper request, the School District shall provide copies of this Resolution. However, any release of said Resolution shall not include the exhibits or attachments hereto as the School Board hereby finds that such materials constitute private data on individuals pursuant to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn. Stat. § 13.32, and the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1232g. The Superintendent is specifically directed to maintain the private data classification of these materials in accordance with all applicable state and federal laws, including the provisions of Chapter 13 of the Minnesota Statutes and 20 U.S.C. §1232g.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Board Member Linder and, upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bjork, Linder, Bender, McConkey and the following voted against the same: none whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Being no further business the meeting adjourned at 6:58 AM
Irene Bender, Clerk
Published in the Enterprise Dispatch March 14, 2011.

UNOFFICIAL SCHOOL BOARD MINUTES I.S.D. #466, BOARD OF EDUCATION 7:00 PM REGULAR BOARD MEETING, FEBRUARY 24, 2011DASSEL-COKATO BOARD ROOM
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the Board of Education of Independent School District No. 466 (Dassel-Cokato, Minnesota) was duly held in the Dassel-Cokato Board Room, Cokato, Minnesota, on Thursday, February 24, 2011.
Board Chairman Kevin Bjork called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM.
The following members were present: Clemen, Tormanen, Bender, McConkey, Linder and Bjork. The following were absent: none. Members of the administration and public were also present.
The meeting began with the pledge of allegiance.
Motion by Bender, seconded by McConkey, accepting the agenda as printed. Motion carried unanimously.
Kristen Haider received the January Russell A. Johnson Courtesy and Respect Award, daughter of Mr. and Mrs. Gregg Haider of Dassel.
Motion by Tormanen, seconded by Linder, approving payment of bills as presented including payroll, hand payables and contingency totaling $2,589,555.31. Motion carried unanimously. (A complete list of bills is available from the District Office for review.)
Communications/Open Forum: None
Curriculum Advisory Committee (CAC) Report: None
Technology Report: None
MAWSECO Report: Vice Chair Tormanen reported on the 2/15 MAWSECO meeting which included: birth to 3 program, directors report, day treatment programs
Community Education Report: Board Member McConkey reported on the 2/3 meeting which included: Kinship Caregivers, Community Education Budget, Craft Fair, upcoming plays, fall and winter programs
Business Manager’s Report: Business Manager Palmer reported expenditures are in line with budget through the end of the eighth month of the fiscal year. Business Manager Palmer informed the board of an administrative review of the food service department was performed by MDE in January. There were no critical errors but the district does have to respond in writing to minor findings found during the review.
Superintendent’s Report: Superintendent Powers reviewed the Middle School Principal hiring process.
Student Representative Report: None
DCRISC – Board Chair Bjork reported that the DCRISC discussed publicity at their last meeting and Vice Chair Tormanen addressed fundraising
SEE – Board Clerk Bender reviewed the last SEE meeting which included presentation by the new Education Commissioner and Online Learning.
Motion by McConkey, seconded by Clemen approving all consent items, which included approval of the minutes from the January 27, 2011 Regular Board Meeting and February 14, 2011 Special Board Meeting. Approval of Wire transfers made on January 28th for $145,000, January 31st for $550,000, February 9th for $350,000, February 10th for $490,000, February 14th for $160,000, and February 17th for $525,000. Personnel Items Approved: Resignation of David Metcalf as Director of the Fall Musical and the One Act Play, Retirement/Resignation of John Rokala as a District CDL Driver effective 2/18/2011, Resignation of Virginia Grosser as ALC/HS Work Experience Teacher effective at the end of the 2010-2011 school year, Employment of Tina Thompson as a ECSE part-time Para effective 2/8/2011, Employment of Kristina Holtz as a ECFE School Readiness Para effective 2/22/2011. Acceptance of Donations: a flute donated to the High School Music Department from Mary Claire Krause and scotch tape rolls valued at $600 donated to the High School office From 3M. Motion carried unanimously.
Motion by Tormanen, seconded by Linder approving the revised 2010-2011 budget. Business Manager Palmer explained the largest changes from the adopted budget included the fund balance in the general fund projecting to increase by an additional $122,455 while the Capital fund balance decreasing by an additional $194,022. Motion carried unanimously.
Motion by Linder, seconded by McConkey authorizing Business Manager Palmer to sell the 2010-11 vocational house. Motion carried unanimously.
Being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 8:42 PM.
Irene Bender, Clerk
Published in the Enterprise Dispatch March 14, 2011.

CHAPTER 96: ADDRESS DISPLAY
Section:
96.01 Purpose
96.02 Compliance
96.03 Penalties
96.04 Severability
96.01 PURPOSE.
The City has determined that due to the interests of public safety it is necessary to protect the residents and businesses of Dassel by instituting this ordinance mandating the display of address numbers for each and every structure within the city limits. This will allow for efficient locating of properties in cases of emergency. And generally provide for navigation more readily throughout the city.
96.02 COMPLIANCE.
A. Display. All houses and principal buildings in the City of Dassel shall display those numbers assigned to them by the City of Dassel.
B. Location and Size. Numbers shall be displayed on the houses or principal buildings in numerals not less than four (4) inches high and of contrasting color to the background.
C. Clearly Visible. Numbers shall be clearly visible from the street to which the address is assigned.
E. Posted Signs. In those cases where the principal building is obscured from the view from the street address by accessory buildings, trees, shrubbery or other visual obstruction, and the residence does not have a mail box, the numbers shall be displayed from a permanent mounting on the property, clearly visible from the street, displayed prominently in numerals not less than four (4) inches high of light reflective material of contrasting color to the background.
96.03 PENALTIES: Every person in violation of the provisions of this ordinance shall be guilty of a civil offense which shall be subject to those penalties contained in Dassel City Code, Chapter 35: Administrative Offenses (as adopted July 21, 2008)
96.04 SEVERABILITY: Should any section, subdivision, clause or other provision of this ordinance be held to be invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the ordinance as a whole, or any part thereof, other than the part held to be invalid.
Myles Mc Grath
Administrator, City of Dassel
Published in the Enterprise Dispatch March 14, 2011.

Notice of Annual MeetingCrow River Mutual Insurance Company
Notice is hereby given that the POLICYHOLDERS ANNUAL MEETING of CROW RIVER MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY will be held on TUESDAY April 5, 2011 – 7:00p.m. at the Peace Lutheran Church – Peace Center; 400 Franklin Street SW; Hutchinson, MN. for the purpose of transacting any business proper to come before said meeting. There will be an election of two Directors to the Board. You must be a member of the Corporation and a resident of the territory in which the Corporation is authorized to do business to file for the Board. Filings for the Board must be done a minimum of 5 days prior to the meeting with the Secretary at the Home Office. Proxy votes are no longer available. You must be present at the meeting to vote.
Robert Wendorff, Manager
Published in the Enterprise Dispatch March 14, 28, 2011.